Moderator Note: The drone strike threads have been consolidated into this single discussion because the topic appears to be popular. Later I'll link the posts to when specific articles are introduced to this original post to make going to certain portions of the discussion easier, if time permits.
The condition that an operational* leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.
Instead, it says,* an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American* has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is* no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”
You don't find the legal precedent disturbing as ****? Basically all it takes is a bureaucrat to put a greenlight on any citizen and they don't have to prove anything to a court of law. You don't know who our government leadership will be and how things will progress 10, 20, 50, 100, etc. years from now.
You don't find the legal precedent disturbing as ****? Basically all it takes is a bureaucrat to put a greenlight on any citizen and they don't have to prove anything to a court of law. You don't know who our government leadership will be and how things will be 10, 20, 50, 100, etc. years from now.
Oh dont get me wrong. I DEFINITELY do. I was just commenting that its highly likely that someone is about to dissapear.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You don't find the legal precedent disturbing as ****? Basically all it takes is a bureaucrat to put a greenlight on any citizen and they don't have to prove anything to a court of law. You don't know who our government leadership will be and how things will be 10, 20, 50, 100, etc. years from now.
You have a false consciousness
I guess we can get really upset and act like this hasn't been happening for decades right?
Quote:
First they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
I guess we can get really upset and act like this hasn't been happening for decades right?
Yeah but these are a part of the target killings program and to just have the U.S. government put an American on a target killing and then actually kill them with no arrest or due process is unprecedented.
Yeah but these are a part of the target killings program and to just have the U.S. government put an American on a target killing and then actually kill them with no arrest or due process is unprecedented.
I'm not even the most cynical guy in here by far and that doesn't ring true.
........................"pretty sure this is just a Con. Theory by A. Jones and J. Ventura.........matterfact put this in the Con. Theory thread and get this faux news off the main page" ..........
- Usual Suspects
__________________
RHCP - "21st Century"
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"There's a reason for the 21st century,
Not too sure, but I know that it's meant to be
And that it's meant to be"